E. Tiurnev
To Win
C. Ilkel
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L W WForm
W W L W W L W W L WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Bastiaansen winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Bastiaansen was at the M15 Pretoria, 02-03-2025, Final, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Cem Ilkel | 1 |
Pepijn Bastiaansen | 0 |
M15 Pretoria(02-03-2025)
Ilkel | Stats | Bastiaansen |
---|---|---|
80% (28-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (19-6) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
574 | Ranking | N/A |
144 | Highest Rank | N/A |
29 | Age | 19 |
R | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 0 |
57% (436-333) | Career Total W/L | 55% (36-30) |
$225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
- / Quarterfinals
24 Apr 2025 / Second
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:21:1 | Average Match Time | 1:21:1 |
64% (43/67) | 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) |
67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (22/35) |
58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
43% (23/53) | Return Points Win % | 36% (24/67) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
F |
![]() ![]()
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Izan Almazan Valiente
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Pepijn Bastiaansen
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57% (436/333) | Win/Loss | 55% (36/30) |
55% (974/804) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (79/71) |
52% (8725/8193) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (725/683) |
62% (286/177) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (21/14) |
45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (14/13) |
55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
2838 | Aces Total | 57 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
1378 | Total Double Faults | 62 |
1:14:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
531.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 199.74 |
58% (23882/40876) | 1st Serve % | 59% (851/1438) |
70% (16801/23882) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (533/851) |
51% (8670/16994) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (282/587) |
40% (1613/3991) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (60/148) |
39% (16099/41358) | Return Points Win % | 41% (588/1447) |
32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (240/120) | Futures W/L | 55% (36/30) |
57% (424/750) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (35/65) |
40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
56% (129/231) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (10/17) |
85% (423/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (34/29) |
14% (423/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (34/5) |
21% (345/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (32/7) |